
J C Note: These
thoughts were first put together in response to a post made
on The Magic Café.
Anyone thinking of embarking on a
career (whether full-time or part-time) as an illusionist
will no doubt dream of bright lights, their own stage, in
their own theatre or perhaps their television special. In
short, making it big as an illusionist.
The ‘luck factor’ plays a
significant role to becoming successful. For purposes of
this discussion, let us suspend our belief and exclude luck
as a factor.
Here are my thoughts on the subject:
Illusions
The
basic techniques and methodologies of illusions, are less
likely to be huge factors. But the presentation and
application of the illusions will be. There will be new
innovations and discoveries but that has always been the
case.
One constant that I think (hope) that will come back with
the next thing in illusion is motivation and good
story-telling in illusion performance. (I don’t consider
‘cheesy’ plots where the magician is ‘captured’ by
bad guys and put into a box etc necessarily good
story-telling unless it is performed WELL in the right
context and the right theatrical environment.)
Good close-up workers (not necessarily the new-age ‘Street
Magicians’) strive for credibility and motivation for all
the actions. There is story-telling, from subtle to
elaborate, in practically every effect. All illusionists
should read Darwin Ortiz’s ‘Strong Magic’ and apply it
to their illusion performance craft. Of course, I recognize
the need for ‘no-brainer’ visual bubble gum in the
context of a larger show. But, I do not think 50 illusions
performed in succession make for a good presentation of
illusion.
Target Market
This
is the single most important factor in making a particular
style/ presentation the next thing in magic. If you are
working only out of a small market segment, no matter how
original and commercial the style is, it is unlikely it will
catch on. The ‘next thing’ means it has to be seen by
many and then perceived to be good and the rage.
Like it or not, mass media markets (Television, Internet,
Movies, Radio?) are generally what make the style of today.
If you are going for any mass media market, being right up
there with the latest in pop culture and trends is a must.
Predicting what the next trend will be a lot trickier. Movie
and music genres/ styles can give an indication of what
might work. Examining financial successes over the past
twenty years might allow for some educated guesses.
Entertainment trends, like fashion and business, are
cyclical.
However, it is also highly possible to establish oneself in
other mainstream markets first, then crossover to mass media
markets. This is generally the route many have taken as
well.
What is your target market for your type of illusion show?
Cruises, Showrooms, Music Concerts, Resorts, Special Events?
What are the hottest shows (out of magic) in your respective
market? Can magic emulate those formulas or use magic to
elevate that formula?
Take advantage of the medium to create something different.
In recent years, that is what has happened with magic on TV.
The medium has been used to great advantage (or deception)
to create an apparent new type of magic.
Many successful magicians all over the world have become the
best because they created the ‘next thing’ within their
respective market segments.
Differentiation
This
will help narrow what the next thing will be; as it is a
certainty that the next thing will not be a ‘me-too’
act. The ‘me-too’ syndrome is just as prevalent in
magic, as it is in other entertainment forms. The true fact
is; there are so many illusion clones out there. I
personally do not understand the phenomena but I accept that
it happens. Ethics aside, I find it difficult to see how one
can except to get wide success by being a dime out of a
dozen. It think there is a market for one clone of another
act but multiple clones?
Again, please understand that I’m speaking from the point
of view of working outside a small market - as this is
relevant to the quest of creating the next thing in grand
illusion. If you are working for laymen within a fixed
population threshold, yes, it makes no difference if you
look the same and perform the same stuff as another person
outside this market. However, if you are looking to make an
impact at a national or international level, you will be
judged by experts in the entertainment field; world-class
talent brokers and show producers. Trust me when I say that
good agents/ producers have literally seen it all… or at
least, anything worth seeing.
Just to illustrate this, here are some specific illusions/
presentations that make informed individuals thing we
‘magicians/ illusionists’ are just the same.
Packing Crate-style Sub Trunk – 9/10 illusionists feature
this. Origami and Interlude are close seconds and thirds as
well. I’m not knocking the illusion, it is a brilliant
illusion but everyone does it and not all well,
unfortunately. I think it is fine to do it in your show
amongst other illusions but don’t put it in your
promotional material. (Again, I stress, I’m not knocking
the illusion. I’m just stating this in the context of the
discussion).
I don’t perform the Sub Trunk for this reason - because
everyone is doing it and it will be too embarrassing for
someone to point this out. How do you answer this question:
“Why do all you magicians perform the same
‘tricks’?” I guess a possible answer is: “Just like
musicians, we perform various classics with our own
interpretation. While they look the same, they do feature
our own unique styles and presentations.” The problem is,
not many see magic as a mainstream art as we do, thus would
not take that answer as a credible one. Another
‘problem’ is inherent with the magic art. Secrecy is a
what separates magic from any other art form. The thing is,
most laymen also think that the secrecy is kept among
magicians as well, especially in the area of grand illusion.
They do not naturally assume we know each other’s secret
methods. Thus, it is surprising to them that we can perform
the same illusions. But, I digress.
Kevin James Snowing Presentation, specifically, the tearing
of the napkin into a ‘snowflake’ and saying real snow is
made of water. Again, it is a beautiful, logical and
motivated piece but has lost its novelty. For the record,
I’ve personally seen the exact presentation performed on
videos and live performances by magicians/ illusionists in
the UK (3 performers), US (10 performers), Singapore (3
performers), Hong Kong, Australia and several from Europe.
I’m sure there are many more out there.
The ‘Copperfield’ Look – The tucked out shift over
T-shirt can be seen on many performers trying to look the
same. Sigh…
The Sentimental Grandfather Story – Everyone has a
grandfather who inspired them with the first magic effect
they learnt etc. Some can pull it off, most cannot. Not
because they are incompetent but it is just not their style.
They are doing it because others are doing it.
Are the above examples only apparent because we are learned
students of the illusion craft and are aware of all that
goes on in magic. Not really, because these examples (except
for the last one) were highlighted to me by an international
show producer.
To understand the business/ commercial upsides of being
different, Jack Trout’s ‘Differentiate or Die’ is a
very easy must-read.
Longevity
This
does not really answer the question but it is something to
consider. While working towards being the ‘next thing’,
which can be a hit & miss thing as mentioned above, it
is wise to consider longevity in the business. Translating a
short-term fad into a sustained success can be a challenge
given today’s ever-changing world.
It is possible to do very well with a ‘safe’ style that
has a long shelf –life with sustained appeal but is
unlikely to be the next BIG thing. But, that is not the
topic of discussion anyway.
I guess the key for all is to present good magic, preserve,
work hard and constantly innovate. Remember, what is often
an overnight success or tomorrow’s trend has actually been
in development for the past decade.
